WORLD AT WAR

Imagine ww3 begins and you have the oportunity to be the supreme general of won of the 9 most powerful countries which would you choose?

Gtfo die r1

It's amusing how he added Portugal in that list for some reason..... portuguese detected

Escrito por RaulPB, 30.08.2016 at 18:27

It's amusing how he added Portugal in that list for some reason..... portuguese detected

and he voted 1st for portugal

Would have to be England. This is where i live. This is who the enemy want to kill. I'll defend my home land.

Sealand

Voted North Korea for the lulz and because Luxembourg isn't an option

Zimbabwe

Ay lmao who voted russia?

Escrito por Free_Warrior, 31.08.2016 at 03:17

Ay lmao who voted russia?

me.

...Portugal?

Usa and China are the only countries who can win the war.North korea could win if Kim wait until all the countries destroy each other.

I never understood how Russia got a reputation for being good at war

Escrito por Free_Warrior, 31.08.2016 at 06:38

Usa and China are the only countries who can win the war.North korea could win if Kim wait until all the countries destroy each other.

Escrito por Free_Warrior, 31.08.2016 at 03:17

Ay lmao who voted russia?

....
Russia and China, not USA and China ffs.
We all know Russia and China are the great alliens, and they would win together, or be nuked from evil american capitalist pig together, and then russia would send Tzar bomb to travel Antlantic and meet with american capitalist pig in Washington.

Escrito por Viruslegion, 31.08.2016 at 13:20

I never understood how Russia got a reputation for being good at war

Because you are bad at math and being lied to.

Russia = 34 won wars, 13 lost [excluding USSR era since that's not Russia, and that period is around 90% won wars, to make it easier for you]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_Russia

Russia is not proud of that, but fact is that Russia is best atwar, simpy because mentality, tradition, geography and bunch of nations invading for millennia.

Escrito por Skanderbeg, 31.08.2016 at 19:18

Out of all those wars the only country Russia seems to be able to consistently defeat is Turkey, and every war has disproportionally higher Russian casualties, even the wars that Russia wins, while most of those are against much smaller nations, not exactly something to be proud of, Russia has far more military disasters than triumphs

Escrito por Viruslegion, 31.08.2016 at 22:19

Escrito por Skanderbeg, 31.08.2016 at 19:18

Out of all those wars the only country Russia seems to be able to consistently defeat is Turkey, and every war has disproportionally higher Russian casualties, even the wars that Russia wins, while most of those are against much smaller nations, not exactly something to be proud of, Russia has far more military disasters than triumphs

Russia is the rp fag on steroids playing imp spamming units

Egypt4lyfe

would be more appropriate to put Turkey rather than Portugal though, and perhaps India or France rather than SK.

No one would win,usa middle east china russia all would throw nuclear missiles everywhere.

GG

Escrito por Cold Case, 01.09.2016 at 06:49

No one would win,usa middle east china russia all would throw nuclear missiles everywhere.

GG

That would kill population count and we wouldnt get anything in reinforcement turn

Escrito por 1GodofWar1, 01.09.2016 at 03:07

Russia is the rp fag on steroids playing imp spamming units

No that's America, remember?

Escrito por Viruslegion, 31.08.2016 at 22:19

Out of all those wars the only country Russia seems to be able to consistently defeat is Turkey, and every war has disproportionally higher Russian casualties, even the wars that Russia wins, while most of those are against much smaller nations, not exactly something to be proud of, Russia has far more military disasters than triumphs

How it can be military disaster when it is won war and survival of the Russian nation achieved? You don't know what you're saying.. Disaster was for Turkey who started to decay and was unable to conquer more Europe, disaster for Swedish Empire who couldn't oppress Finland and Baltic anymore, disaster for Poland who could not catholicize and torture Christians anymore, disaster for Mongol Horde who could not raid Europe anymore and trade slaves.

34:13

One of these wars were against much stronger opponent but still they end up defeated by Russia, like Grand Armee, Golden Horde, Wehrmacht.
Russia unforunately didn't participated in WW2 as a country, but still Russian people contributed 80% to total war effort and destroyed 80% of the enemy strength (100% of total sent on USSR). If Hitler respected non-aggression pact, he would simply send all those soldiers, tanks and planes on England, blitzkrieg it and then prep for Invasion of Americas. Sure Battle of Britain was defeat for Hitler, but English would not survive second wave of attack in 1941 - the force which was meant for USSR.

If there are no nukes in this WW3 you speak of, but purely conventional forces, East win.
America need war to reset debt, but Europe doesn't need and have internal problems
Germany won't allow new war now when their economy is the strongest, they risk to lose it
That leaves America without Europe with only Canada, Australia, Japan and Saudi Arabia
Russia doesn't need war because it's aware it is easier to achieve goals through diplomacy
Ukraine and Baltic hate Russia and ask America to come and start the war, Germany as the leader of EU deny US access
Angered America invade Europe to place dictatorships and use their troops against the World
Russia help Germany against American invasion
America open second front with Japan against China, but China is prepared with numerical superiority
US ally Saudi Arabia open third front in Middle East, Russian ally Iran counter Saudi Arabia and help Iraq and Syria
Israel see opportunity to annex Gaza, but Egypt send chariots

American invasion of Europe fail with their ally(pawn) England losing most troops and its economy
Europe is ruined but they cooperate with each other to rebuild
China win Battle of Japan and annex Taiwan, while millions of infantry volunteers protect Chinese border towards Vietnam and Indochina
North Korea invade South Korea and win due to American inability to help South Korea
China keep spamming submarines and ships and send them to fight Americans for Pacific Superiority
America is unable to spam more planes and ships due to Capitalist system where money is required and they already have 100% debt
They lost Battle for Pacific and China annex Hawaii, Russia landed in Alaska
To avoid losses America sue for peace, China, Russia and Europe accept
America is not allowed to have more than 50,000 troops and its miltiary-industrial complex is dismantled
Their economy collapsed due to debt and trade is impossible due to international sanctions for trying to conquer the world
America is isolated, many states seek independence to try rebuild economy and regain international trust, California and Texas are first

Middle East is devastated by war caused by Saudi Arabia and their terrorism funding, but they eventually collapse due to debt and no oil trade(due to war)
Saudi Arabia cease to exist and other Arabian totalitarian dictatorship fall as well, Arab tribes finally regain freedom
Africa is no longer colonized, they start to rebuild their countries and economies by selling resources at market prices unlike before at monopoly-held corporate fixed cost
South America is finally allowed to attack drug cartels and destroy them
Middle East is free to destroy terrorism
Pakistan pay reparations to India
Russia build wall on Ukrainian border, Ukrainian nazi government fail and people start eating each other like 90 years ago during Holodomor, they again blame Russia for that
Baltic states crumble due to lack of foreign aid, they lurk for jews but there are none, so they invade Poland but fail and get occupied

All problems on Earth are solved few years later
Poverty reduces, wealthy taxes properly
Hungers end in Africa and FC Millwall win the world cup
God's second arrival

Escrito por Skanderbeg, 01.09.2016 at 07:40

Grand Armee, Golden Horde, Wehrmacht.

The Grand Armee and Wehrmacht were defeated by the weather and Russia's sheer size more than the Russian people, Napoleon demolished the Russians at every battle, and the Wehrmacht was a day from Moscow when the winter stopped them, and let's not forget how badly Russia lost to the Germans in the first world war

Escrito por Viruslegion, 01.09.2016 at 11:53

The Grand Armee and Wehrmacht were defeated by the weather and Russia's sheer size more than the Russian people, Napoleon demolished the Russians at every battle, and the Wehrmacht was a day from Moscow when the winter stopped them, and let's not forget how badly Russia lost to the Germans in the first world war

You can be fussy about it, that's your right.

Russia win because winter, America win because spam, China win because billions, Terrorists win because balls, Europe rich because printing money.

You would be great insurance salesman.

Escrito por Viruslegion, 01.09.2016 at 11:53

Escrito por Skanderbeg, 01.09.2016 at 07:40

Grand Armee, Golden Horde, Wehrmacht.

The Grand Armee and Wehrmacht were defeated by the weather and Russia's sheer size more than the Russian people, Napoleon demolished the Russians at every battle, and the Wehrmacht was a day from Moscow when the winter stopped them, and let's not forget how badly Russia lost to the Germans in the first world war

For every Russian, 2 French died during Napoleonic wars, no country could've defeated the Grande armée in a pitch battle at the time. Russia won alot more battles then France during Napoleons campaign in Russia, most of these of small size, Napoleon won the big battles but it did not accomplish anything. First world war was mainly because of the communists, one could argue Lenin was a German spy, but still Russia lost because of communists. I am not saying they performed well in World War 1, especially the German front. The other fronts with Austria and Ottomans they were doing pretty well.

Escrito por Skanderbeg, 01.09.2016 at 12:39

Russia win because winter, America win because spam, China win because billions

These three are certainly true

Escrito por Skanderbeg, 01.09.2016 at 12:39

You would be great insurance salesman.

Thanks, for what it's worth I think you would be a good author

Escrito por The_Empirezz, 01.09.2016 at 14:43

First world war was mainly because of the communists, one could argue Lenin was a German spy, but still Russia lost because of communists.

These are all before communists, and they're all still horrible defeats for Russia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Tannenberg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Battle_of_the_Masurian_Lakes
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Battle_of_the_Masurian_Lakes

Escrito por Viruslegion, 01.09.2016 at 21:30

Thanks, for what it's worth I think you would be a good author

Thanks, many people told me that, i had a great history professor who was also my mentor for PhD and taught me to write articles.

Escrito por Viruslegion, 01.09.2016 at 21:30

These are all before communists, and they're all still horrible defeats for Russia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Tannenberg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Battle_of_the_Masurian_Lakes
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Battle_of_the_Masurian_Lakes

As you see, Russian general was actually a western spy, that's why lost battles.

Anyhow, Russia had 3 fronts (german/baltic front, austrian/romanian front and turkish/caucasian front) unlike other participants of WW1 which had 1 or 2. One front is hard enough to fight, let alone three.

And Russia did good on 2 of 3 fronts: captured few Austrian cities, made 1 million casualties for austrian army which crippled Austria never to recover and was beating Turkey, taking from them few cities and killing 100,000 troops, while losing from the Germans. So generally speaking, Russia did good in WW1, not bad, not decent, but good, maybe very good.

Escrito por Skanderbeg, 02.09.2016 at 06:27

Nice not including casualties

Escrito por Skanderbeg, 02.09.2016 at 06:27

As you see, Russian general was actually a western spy, that's why lost battles.

Even if he was a spy, which I don't see any proof saying he was, it doesn't explain the laughably bad casualties for Russia, while the Germans barely took any

Escrito por Skanderbeg, 02.09.2016 at 06:27

Anyhow, Russia had 3 fronts (german/baltic front, austrian/romanian front and turkish/caucasian front) unlike other participants of WW1 which had 1 or 2. One front is hard enough to fight, let alone three.

Germany had four fronts, Western Front against UK/France, Eastern against Russia, and also sent troops to the Italian front and the Austrian front against Russia and Romania
Austria had four as well, against Italy, Serbia, Russia, and Romania

You both are boring as hell