Conspiracy theories (£ žIt is all about $)

Theres a game company based in malaysia called kingjim gaming group(CEO name is kingjim ) you guys can look it up and come to the ceo and beg him to buy the game
Insya Allah he will reply to you all. And also 1 more thing..make sure you have a good damn reason for him to buy this game
Spoke to him.once
What a cool funny guy. Goodluck

Oh my, OK.

1. The game is not dying. Player numbers are stable and we fully intend to continue supporting atWar for years to come. Anyway, I could probably find posts from 5 years ago claiming the game is dead.
2. We're now aware of the Chrome problem and are going to fix it ASAP.
3. Capt_PepPeroni, I will reply to you in private.
4. LOL if you guys think that selling the game to a big company is going to save it. After paying us they are going to make sure they squeeze as much profit from atWar as possible - that necessarily means pay to win and other dirty tricks.

Escrito por Ivan, 28.12.2016 at 05:14

Oh my, OK.

1. The game is not dying. Player numbers are stable and we fully intend to continue supporting atWar for years to come. Anyway, I could probably find posts from 5 years ago claiming the game is dead.
2. We're now aware of the Chrome problem and are going to fix it ASAP.
3. Capt_PepPeroni, I will reply to you in private.
4. LOL if you guys think that selling the game to a big company is going to save it. After paying us they are going to make sure they squeeze as much profit from atWar as possible - that necessarily means pay to win and other dirty tricks.

Thank you for your response, it is very much needed, but I have a few concerns that the community shares:

- The fact that you intend to support AW is great and a relief to hear, but you also need to show it. People are concerned about map maker, servers, etc, and we have not heard from you guys in ages (I went inactive for a few months and came back, and nothing had changed). If we can just get a realistic ETA for the map maker and a show of some commitment, I think the community will be greatly put at ease, and activity will start to grow again. While numbers may have not necessarily fallen, quality has. Competitiveness has declined and no new maps are coming out. While the game is still enjoyable, this is an issue that needs to be tended to.

- We don't want the game to be pay2win for sure, but we also want to see the game moving forward. I know that you guys are busy and all, but the community has some great ideas for not only things to implement, but also ways to enhance the overall game quality, such as hiring a full time programmer and giving them a percentage of monthly premium revenue or of the game as a whole.

I hope you can take some time to go around the forums and see how the game's doing, and we all hope that you guys update us and keep in touch.

Cheers.

Escrito por The Tactician, 28.12.2016 at 05:35

Escrito por Ivan, 28.12.2016 at 05:14

- We don't want the game to be pay2win for sure, but we also want to see the game moving forward. I know that you guys are busy and all, but the community has some great ideas for not only things to implement, but also ways to enhance the overall game quality, such as hiring a full time programmer and giving them a percentage of monthly premium revenue or of the game as a whole.

support

Escrito por Ivan, 28.12.2016 at 05:14

Oh my, OK.

1. The game is not dying. Player numbers are stable and we fully intend to continue supporting atWar for years to come. Anyway, I could probably find posts from 5 years ago claiming the game is dead.
2. We're now aware of the Chrome problem and are going to fix it ASAP.
3. Capt_PepPeroni, I will reply to you in private.
4. LOL if you guys think that selling the game to a big company is going to save it. After paying us they are going to make sure they squeeze as much profit from atWar as possible - that necessarily means pay to win and other dirty tricks.

I privatly know people eho are willing to find sponsors for AtWar but they cannot because you don't have IP (except for copyright, bot copyright is not enough).
Also, there is a problem that no one controls moderators, some of them are banning whoever they want and that is not okay.
Also i don't understand why does Sun Tzu have admin position if he is not admin anymore?
And, last question: Why don't you start some project like steam greenlight is, to get the capital?
I am very happy that you want to care for this game, but we don't know about Amok, he's the programmer...
I do not want this to be a hate post, but a constructive one, players on AtWar speak about dying of AtWar, that is half true. The player base is not stable, it is smaller and smaller. In winter of 2014, the medium number of players in peak hours (8-12pm CET) was 200, now it is 46...

Escrito por Cheesus_Crust, 28.12.2016 at 01:38

Escrito por clovis1122, 27.12.2016 at 10:04

Why how what where, someone like you who spent thousands of hours here can be so indifference about this ?!

After going through a dozen of threads like this, I fail to see how it will solve the current situation - not even offering anything different from what was spoken.

Escrito por The Tactician, 28.12.2016 at 05:35

- We don't want the game to be pay2win for sure

At this point I'd rather atWar to become pay2win (more than it already is @General) but to improve servers stability, solve the hundreds of bugs and move forward. The concept was nice, but we gotta be more realist here.

Either the admins abandon some of their compromises and obligations to give this game the time that it deserves, or sell it to another person/Company that can give it the time that this deserves. The solution won't just fall from a tree. Bugs aren't magically going to be solved nor server will suddenly improve from the night to a morning. All that requires time and effort*.

Again admins show up full of words and no actions?

Escrito por Ivan, 28.12.2016 at 05:14

Oh my, OK.

1. The game is not dying. Player numbers are stable and we fully intend to continue supporting atWar for years to come. Anyway, I could probably find posts from 5 years ago claiming the game is dead.
2. We're now aware of the Chrome problem and are going to fix it ASAP.
3. Capt_PepPeroni, I will reply to you in private.
4. LOL if you guys think that selling the game to a big company is going to save it. After paying us they are going to make sure they squeeze as much profit from atWar as possible - that necessarily means pay to win and other dirty tricks.

Ivan. The numbers you are looking at are wrong. Take a look at the competitive seen, half the activity of last year. Main lobby full of r7s and 8 with no early day games to be played. RP consuming the player base of low ranks, meaning no spread of games.

You need the map editor and updates or more high ranks will be gone, meaning no backbone for the game = no growth.

You little shit, I'm buying this site.

Escrito por JF., 28.12.2016 at 09:33

Escrito por Ivan, 28.12.2016 at 05:14

Oh my, OK.

1. The game is not dying. Player numbers are stable and we fully intend to continue supporting atWar for years to come. Anyway, I could probably find posts from 5 years ago claiming the game is dead.
2. We're now aware of the Chrome problem and are going to fix it ASAP.
3. Capt_PepPeroni, I will reply to you in private.
4. LOL if you guys think that selling the game to a big company is going to save it. After paying us they are going to make sure they squeeze as much profit from atWar as possible - that necessarily means pay to win and other dirty tricks.

Ivan. The numbers you are looking at are wrong. Take a look at the competitive seen, half the activity of last year. Main lobby full of r7s and 8 with no early day games to be played. RP consuming the player base of low ranks, meaning no spread of games.

You need the map editor and updates or more high ranks will be gone, meaning no backbone for the game = no growth.

competitive isn't equal to activity, believe it or no, people have fun in rp, and that's enough reason to play, also, high ranks are perhaps the backbone of the forum, but by no means the backbone of the game, most players usually avoid playing against high ranks if possible, high ranks usually avoids to play against low ranks if possible too

Escrito por Skittzophrenic, 28.12.2016 at 10:00

You little shit, I'm buying this site.

I can contribute the half

Escrito por Zeeroo, 28.12.2016 at 10:09

Escrito por JF., 28.12.2016 at 09:33

Escrito por Ivan, 28.12.2016 at 05:14

Oh my, OK.

1. The game is not dying. Player numbers are stable and we fully intend to continue supporting atWar for years to come. Anyway, I could probably find posts from 5 years ago claiming the game is dead.
2. We're now aware of the Chrome problem and are going to fix it ASAP.
3. Capt_PepPeroni, I will reply to you in private.
4. LOL if you guys think that selling the game to a big company is going to save it. After paying us they are going to make sure they squeeze as much profit from atWar as possible - that necessarily means pay to win and other dirty tricks.

Ivan. The numbers you are looking at are wrong. Take a look at the competitive seen, half the activity of last year. Main lobby full of r7s and 8 with no early day games to be played. RP consuming the player base of low ranks, meaning no spread of games.

You need the map editor and updates or more high ranks will be gone, meaning no backbone for the game = no growth.

competitive isn't equal to activity, believe it or no, people have fun in rp, and that's enough reason to play, also, high ranks are perhaps the backbone of the forum, but by no means the backbone of the game, most players usually avoid playing against high ranks if possible, high ranks usually avoids to play against low ranks if possible too

High ranks have the knowledge of the game, If there is none then the 6 years of knowledge goes away. The forum only does so much. Competitive is one of the biggest parts of the game and has gone down in activity cause of the admins. RP is just nonsense.

Empty words from Ivan (once per month) ...

Aw need active players, mods and ADMINS. Or in translate, aw need something new to be interesting again.

Its a red panty night.

Escrito por JF., 28.12.2016 at 10:26

Escrito por Zeeroo, 28.12.2016 at 10:09

Escrito por JF., 28.12.2016 at 09:33

Escrito por Ivan, 28.12.2016 at 05:14

Oh my, OK.

1. The game is not dying. Player numbers are stable and we fully intend to continue supporting atWar for years to come. Anyway, I could probably find posts from 5 years ago claiming the game is dead.
2. We're now aware of the Chrome problem and are going to fix it ASAP.
3. Capt_PepPeroni, I will reply to you in private.
4. LOL if you guys think that selling the game to a big company is going to save it. After paying us they are going to make sure they squeeze as much profit from atWar as possible - that necessarily means pay to win and other dirty tricks.

Ivan. The numbers you are looking at are wrong. Take a look at the competitive seen, half the activity of last year. Main lobby full of r7s and 8 with no early day games to be played. RP consuming the player base of low ranks, meaning no spread of games.

You need the map editor and updates or more high ranks will be gone, meaning no backbone for the game = no growth.

competitive isn't equal to activity, believe it or no, people have fun in rp, and that's enough reason to play, also, high ranks are perhaps the backbone of the forum, but by no means the backbone of the game, most players usually avoid playing against high ranks if possible, high ranks usually avoids to play against low ranks if possible too

High ranks have the knowledge of the game, If there is none then the 6 years of knowledge goes away. The forum only does so much. Competitive is one of the biggest parts of the game and has gone down in activity cause of the admins. RP is just nonsense.

Knowledge that only works in 3vs3, which only high ranks play to begin with

Escrito por Nations, 28.12.2016 at 09:18

Again admins show up full of words and no actions?

We've fixed the Chrome bug within an hour of my post. What other words did I use that you're sceptical about?

Escrito por The Tactician, 28.12.2016 at 05:35

Thank you for your response, it is very much needed, but I have a few concerns that the community shares:

- The fact that you intend to support AW is great and a relief to hear, but you also need to show it. People are concerned about map maker, servers, etc, and we have not heard from you guys in ages (I went inactive for a few months and came back, and nothing had changed). If we can just get a realistic ETA for the map maker and a show of some commitment, I think the community will be greatly put at ease, and activity will start to grow again. While numbers may have not necessarily fallen, quality has. Competitiveness has declined and no new maps are coming out. While the game is still enjoyable, this is an issue that needs to be tended to.

- We don't want the game to be pay2win for sure, but we also want to see the game moving forward. I know that you guys are busy and all, but the community has some great ideas for not only things to implement, but also ways to enhance the overall game quality, such as hiring a full time programmer and giving them a percentage of monthly premium revenue or of the game as a whole.

I hope you can take some time to go around the forums and see how the game's doing, and we all hope that you guys update us and keep in touch.

I'm afraid I cannot give a realistic ETA for the map maker, as it's entirely up to Amok at this point, and trust me, I'm doing what I can to push the subject every time we talk. He has a few days of holidays now, hopefully something will get done.
Of course, there are plenty of things for me to do as well, but I just cannot seem to find the time. This is as frustrating for me as it is for you, trust me.

It would be nice to have the budget to hire people - for marketing and programming, but our revenue is rather pitiful, and we can't really afford it. One thing we discussed was opening up the client source code, but that needs more consideration.

Escrito por Ivan, 28.12.2016 at 11:44

We've fixed the Chrome bug within an hour of my post. What other words did I use that you're sceptical about?

Chrome is still broken for me

Escrito por Ivan, 28.12.2016 at 11:44

Escrito por Nations, 28.12.2016 at 09:18

Again admins show up full of words and no actions?

We've fixed the Chrome bug within an hour of my post. What other words did I use that you're sceptical about?

I do really hope there's some sort of confusion here.

Go Ivan Go!

Escrito por Viruslegion, 28.12.2016 at 11:58

Escrito por Ivan, 28.12.2016 at 11:44

We've fixed the Chrome bug within an hour of my post. What other words did I use that you're sceptical about?

Chrome is still broken for me

Make sure you clear your cache. Amok updated the mscorlib.min.js file.

Escrito por Ivan, 28.12.2016 at 11:52

I'm afraid I cannot give a realistic ETA for the map maker, as it's entirely up to Amok at this point, and trust me, I'm doing what I can to push the subject every time we talk. He has a few days of holidays now, hopefully something will get done.
Of course, there are plenty of things for me to do as well, but I just cannot seem to find the time. This is as frustrating for me as it is for you, trust me.

It would be nice to have the budget to hire people - for marketing and programming, but our revenue is rather pitiful, and we can't really afford it. One thing we discussed was opening up the client source code, but that needs more consideration.

just whip him into submission

Working on Chrome

Escrito por Ivan, 28.12.2016 at 11:52

Escrito por The Tactician, 28.12.2016 at 05:35

One thing we discussed was opening up the client source code, but that needs more consideration.

SUP

I used to be pretty angry about everything until I realized that in all reality coding is a strenuous thing that takes quite a plethora of time to function properly (atleast with this kinda stuff). Cut ivan and amok some slack...

Escrito por Valetorious, 28.12.2016 at 16:16

I used to be pretty angry about everything until I realized that in all reality coding is a strenuous thing that takes quite a plethora of time to function properly (atleast with this kinda stuff). Cut ivan and amok some slack...

It's even more strenuous when you have to do it at 10pm, after an intense day at work and dealing with a demanding toddler at home

I don't know how much can be possible, but if there's people in this forum that are willing to "help the game" buying it, then they can give the money (just if they are willing to do it) to hire the people that you both don't can, as you said (full time programmers and everything what this needs). Besides, if you started and conduced this to be a good game, you both had to know this would require a lot of time to care, so you should've planned something about it if you knew that Amok and you was to have a full time job. If this sounds acid, sorry. But it's the truth. I'd like to help as much as I can, but I'm too poor to do it. So I leave here this opinion.

Escrito por Ivan, 28.12.2016 at 16:35

Escrito por Valetorious, 28.12.2016 at 16:16

I used to be pretty angry about everything until I realized that in all reality coding is a strenuous thing that takes quite a plethora of time to function properly (atleast with this kinda stuff). Cut ivan and amok some slack...

It's even more strenuous when you have to do it at 10pm, after an intense day at work and dealing with a demanding toddler at home

I'm pretty sure it doesn't take 1 year to finish a feature that's already testable and partially functioning.

Escrito por Helly, 28.12.2016 at 13:34

Go Ivan Go!

The same guy that cry about map editor every week threathened to leave atwar & sue the game..demand for explanation and once the admins is quiet once again he goes back to making threads demanding for refund..admins explain stuff to him and he act like a little girl that just got a lollipop from the admins. "go ivan go" next time the admins is quiet once again we will see hellykin learning "how to code" to take over atwar. Hellykin , youre such an idiot & also a hypocrite. I bet you get bullied alot