Eventually it will die out

Meh if you don't like the map don't play it. This game provides you the tools you need to make what map you want to make. So just make what you want to make and play what you want to play.

Escrito por Permamuted, 11.09.2014 at 09:47

Escrito por Khal.eesi, 11.09.2014 at 09:46

Back off clovis meanies!!!i love the new clovis, so cute <3 GO CLOVIS GO!!!!

you shouldnt encourage this behaviour just because its cute!! youd make a bad parent khal =/

lol ikr..cant help it..especially if i have a girl she is gonna be one spoiled bratty little princess <3
go clovis go!!

Take theses simple and basic examples, decided by vows and opinions:

1)People who play atWar are constantly sayding:

" Game suck"
" RP ruined all the competitiving"
" I hate this game"
" Fag community"

And they have their legitm reason for say so about the game. Bugs, problems with player, all theses are legitm reasons. However, if you are making a review of the game for post it in your page, Would you say the game is bad because the peoples say so? or the game is good based in the fact that ACTUALLY THE SAME PEOPLES THAT SAY THE GAME SUCK, PLAY IT EVERY DAMM DAY.

2)There are many maps on atWar. You can play the one you want. However, many players *thinkg* RP is bad map because unbalanced and careless of competitive envioment, while others players simply play it.

Which one is bad? Well, both the player who play it have his right opinion, and the player who say the map is bad also have their right opinion. Which one then, should be enforced? If both parts are right?

vows. And actually, the RP part win. This mean the other part need to play RP? no.

3) There are some players which support the use of rewalling in the games. And there are some players which doesnt support the uses in the game.

Wherever support rewalling or not, both argument are valid. Which one, then, is legitm?

vows again. The neutrality is likery to win, then, the "NO" to rewalling. This mean people who rewall need to stop rewalling? no.

Escrito por clovis1122, 11.09.2014 at 10:38

Same as leaf. Stay out of comments if you are just going to insult without adding somenthing constructive to the post.

that was a constructive post, take my advice, youre making yourself look like a tool with all these irrelevant offtopic posts, and all because you cant accept you committed a fallacy in your original post in this thread. and you're doing this in multiple threads, its annoying and you should stop it. stop it now.

Escrito por Permamuted, 11.09.2014 at 10:47

Escrito por clovis1122, 11.09.2014 at 10:38

Same as leaf. Stay out of comments if you are just going to insult without adding somenthing constructive to the post.

that was a constructive post, take my advice, youre making yourself look like a tool with all these irrelevant offtopic posts, and all because you cant accept you committed a fallacy in your original post in this thread. and you're doing this in multiple threads, its annoying and you should stop it. stop it now.

You dont have any proof that my comment is a fallacy. So you might want to not comment about it.

Also it is obvious based in the insult you launched at me how the post was made for the purpose of insult. How you expect me, then, to take it as constructive?

Escrito por clovis1122, 11.09.2014 at 10:47

new bad-ass clovis (weak arguments but supports them with style!)

god, even your english are getting so much better.let me adopt you plsss!!!! <3

Escrito por clovis1122, 11.09.2014 at 10:47

You dont have any proof that my comment is a fallacy. So you might want to not comment about it.

Also it is obvious based in the insult you launched at me how the post was made for the purpose of insult. How you expect me, then, to take it as constructive?

Escrito por clovis1122, 10.09.2014 at 19:20

the great amount of people that play RP already prove it to be a good map.

is this proof enough for you? This is a fallacy, your basis for rp being a good map is because the masses play it. this is the definition of ad populum. i dont care about the technicalities of voting polls, that theres both good and bad drugs, about food not necessarily being good because starving people eat it. I dont care clovis, you committed a fallacy with this post. Now just accept you made an error and move on. There was no need for the 5 other irrelevant posts that you made.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum

Taked from your own referal:



Appeal the mayority is valid when you are making a choise between two (valid) arguments.

Escrito por clovis1122, 10.09.2014 at 19:20

the great amount of people that play RP already prove it to be a good map.

appeal to common practice as a basis for rp being good = fallacy. i dont care about all your other nonsense examples posts and screenshots, you committed a fallacy.

[pr] clovis1122.: proof: 1) You learn reinformeds efficiently very well here 2) You learn to make big walls 3) Also a lot of people prefer it.

then you committed that same fallacy again with point number 3, and where is your "proof" that you learn to use reinforcements very efficiently there, who can confirm this alleged "proof".

in this discussion alone clovis you have committed 3 fallacies, youve committed an "appeal to common practice fallacy" twice, and a "suppressed evidence" fallacy as seen in your pr.

just stop it.

Escrito por clovis1122, 10.09.2014 at 22:01

It is not a fallacy. A lot of people plays RP. That is a fact which lead to our premise, RP is a good map.

You may think is a fallacy because the people that play rp think it is good, but I am not basing my premise on THEIR OPINION, but in the FACT that they ACTUALLY PLAY IT. It is like a poll or democracy, you dont take into consideration who the people think is best, but actually, their vows.


" People think this is" = Fallacy.

" People do this" = Valid argument.


Your example is also based on what the starved people THINKS, not in what they actually do. They eat the food, you cant prove with this information that the food is good, but you can say that they eat the food.

A conditional conclusion that follow this example: " IF they eat the food, then it should be a good food" is a fallacy as there isn a type of relation between the premise and the fact. This is not Ad populum where the premise is based on what people thinks, but just a premise and a fact that doesnt have any type of relation.

The conclusion you are looking based on Ad populum is this one: " A bunch of half-starved folks are given free food, and they are ask about how good the food was. They say the food was good, so the people who gived the free food opened up a restaurant, sayding that their food is good. After that, a cheft come and rates the food as 1/10."

The people who gived the free food are basing their statement in what the starved-people thinks about it. If their food was good, then they would base it in the fact that a lot of people go and eat there.

Proved that your 1st premise is false, your other premises which are based on the 1st premise are also false.

This is what you get when you type in "Clovis-type" English and then use a Thesaurus to translate every word to a professional word.

Nope. Read the SS. Ad populum is allowed when making a desicion. There is a vows somewhere else which votes about RP. Search for it.


BTW, whatever is discussed here, doesnt quit the fact that RP is a good map and people wont stop playing it. GG

Yea look whatever, i really dont care if you think rp is a good map, and if you think opi is a better player than you meester and chess. just stop shittposting all over threads.

Escrito por Permamuted, 11.09.2014 at 11:36

Yea look whatever, i really dont care if you think rp is a good map, and if you think opi is a better player than you meester and chess. just stop shittposting all over threads.

Never say opi is best player that meester and chess. Where you get this at all? SS or never happened.

If you dont care then stop posting <3. Already proved my point.

Escrito por clovis1122, 11.09.2014 at 11:33

Nope. Read the SS. Ad populum is allowed when making a desicion. There is a vows somewhere else which votes about RP. Search for it.


BTW, whatever is discussed here, doesnt quit the fact that RP is a good map and people wont stop playing it. GG

Who are you to say RP is a good map? On what basis or standar?

Me in the other hand.... I am a map maker, and like the rest of map makers, we share the same opinion about RP: its a bad map.

Escrito por Tundy, 11.09.2014 at 11:39

Escrito por clovis1122, 11.09.2014 at 11:33

Nope. Read the SS. Ad populum is allowed when making a desicion. There is a vows somewhere else which votes about RP. Search for it.


BTW, whatever is discussed here, doesnt quit the fact that RP is a good map and people wont stop playing it. GG

Who are you to say RP is a good map? On what basis or standar?

Me in the other hand.... I am a map maker, and like the rest of map makers, we share the same opinion about RP: its a bad map.

I am not speaking by myself, I am providing you facts about it.

What is the point of MapMarkers if we suddely stop playing all theses maps and only play default map eh?

Escrito por clovis1122, 11.09.2014 at 11:45

Escrito por Tundy, 11.09.2014 at 11:39

Escrito por clovis1122, 11.09.2014 at 11:33

Nope. Read the SS. Ad populum is allowed when making a desicion. There is a vows somewhere else which votes about RP. Search for it.


BTW, whatever is discussed here, doesnt quit the fact that RP is a good map and people wont stop playing it. GG

Who are you to say RP is a good map? On what basis or standar?

Me in the other hand.... I am a map maker, and like the rest of map makers, we share the same opinion about RP: its a bad map.

I am not speaking by myself, I am providing you facts about it.

What is the point of MapMarkers if we suddely stop playing all theses maps and only play default map eh?

Your statement has already been proven to be a fallacy, it doesn't matter how much you rationalize it or how many times you claim that your statement is a fact; it will always be a fallacy.

You have admitted that all that matters is a consensus,

People that have played Maps: A and B say that B is a good map
People that have played Maps: A,B,C,D.E,F and many others, say that map B is bad.

Who is more reliable?

Is clear that you are just cherry picking data.... Another fallacy.

Lel Clovis, did you read my post at all? You say Twilight is good even though it has bad acting, terrible plot and lowish reviews? Just because a lot of people like it?

Let's imagine, there is this musician, and he writes terrible songs. Such as stupid lyrics, and utterly terrible singing. But millions still like him, so all of the sudden he becomes the next Mozart? Just because millions pick horrible songs?

Accept it, you made a mistake called a fallacy. Shit happens. Move on.

Well of course it's gonna die out. All things die out. But the reason why it will die is mostly likely gonna be because some other RP/UN type game will arise.

Escrito por clovis1122, 11.09.2014 at 12:56

Escrito por Tundy, 11.09.2014 at 11:53

Your statement has already been proven to be a fallacy, it doesn't matter how much you rationalize it or how many times you claim that your statement is a fact; it will always be a fallacy.

You have admitted that all that matters is a consensus,

People that have played Maps: A and B say that B is a good map
People that have played Maps: A,B,C,D.E,F and many others, say that map B is bad.

Who is more reliable?

Is clear that you are just cherry picking data.... Another fallacy.

You are putting examples that doesnt go with your premise. Dude, is like if you say " Tophats beat chess in a europe duel, so Mauzer is the best player". There isn any type of relation between what you are typing and what you are talking. No man, take a time, think, then post.

Escrito por Guest, 11.09.2014 at 12:16

Lel Clovis, did you read my post at all? You say Twilight is good even though it has bad acting, terrible plot and lowish reviews? Just because a lot of people like it?

Let's imagine, there is this musician, and he writes terrible songs. Such as stupid lyrics, and utterly terrible singing. But millions still like him, so all of the sudden he becomes the next Mozart? Just because millions pick horrible songs?

Accept it, you made a mistake called a fallacy. Shit happens. Move on.

I dont know nothing about twilight, but if 5 billons of people of the people likes it then it should be somenthing good. Again, you say <<a lot of people>>.

I am tired of this. WHatever you say, people will still keep playing RP. This threat charge nothing. GG NO RE.

Imbecile, this topic is about how long it will take RP to die, and why.
Not about killing it.

Cri moar. U just said twilight is good, even when u haven't see it. Just because 60% people saw it. Lel

That moment when people are arguing if RP is good or not.

Why justify the masses opinion when it is your own personal opinion that you should be worrying about?

Anywho cake.

>This thread
But back on topic...
The only reason, a-hem, the main reason RP is popular is because most lower ranks play it. It's easy for them with the OP units and OP income of the poorly drawn borders. There is no skill involved unless you are an RP player, well then, there is skill but you don't have the skill to play other maps if all you do is play RP maps.
For example, I've played with rank 10's who didn't wall at all and played like a total retard. I'm pretty sure those people are RP players, they don't have a clue about how to play with small amounts of money and non-OP units. Then they complain about how it's not enough money and the units suck. And then there are the tards who think every game they join is RP.
It's pretty sad though, RP is nothing but a bunch of OP units and money and makes new players think it's a good game, which isn't at all.

Anyways, say I'm wrong or whatever, but I know I'm right.

Escrito por Tundy, 11.09.2014 at 13:39

It was a decent topic, until clovis went full delusional...

What delusional whether RP is good or bad is just an individual opinion. nothing else. This topic needs to be deleted and provides nothing new or helpful to the community as such.

Clovis, but those 5 ''billion'' (lolwut) people don't seem to have a good choice in movies, so if most people in the world choose bad movies those movies all of the sudden become good?

Escrito por minusSeven, 11.09.2014 at 16:21

Escrito por Tundy, 11.09.2014 at 13:39

It was a decent topic, until clovis went full delusional...

What delusional whether RP is good or bad is just an individual opinion. nothing else. This topic needs to be deleted and provides nothing new or helpful to the community as such.

>unbalanced economies
>unreasonable reinf boost
>lazy borders
>unbalanced units

Escrito por Guest, 12.09.2014 at 05:43

>unreasonable reinf boost
>lazy borders
>unbalanced units

Funny thing is that is just your opinion nothing else. Lot of people enjoy playing RP, thats good enough for me.

Escrito por minusSeven, 12.09.2014 at 09:44

Escrito por Guest, 12.09.2014 at 05:43

>unreasonable reinf boost
>lazy borders
>unbalanced units

Funny thing is that is just your opinion nothing else. Lot of people enjoy playing RP, thats good enough for me.

Support ^

Escrito por minusSeven, 12.09.2014 at 09:44

Escrito por Guest, 12.09.2014 at 05:43

>unreasonable reinf boost
>lazy borders
>unbalanced units

Funny thing is that is just your opinion nothing else. Lot of people enjoy playing RP, thats good enough for me.

Is not about opinion, you can think RP is a good map, but is not.
Its a uncontested consensus in the map making community, that RP performs poorly in all aspects of map making.

Other map makers, including me: don't even recognize RP as a custom map, but just as default map with custom units. Why? Because there is no new borders, all of them are just copy paste of default map.

Escrito por minusSeven, 12.09.2014 at 09:44

Escrito por Guest, 12.09.2014 at 05:43

>unreasonable reinf boost
>lazy borders
>unbalanced units

Funny thing is that is just your opinion nothing else. Lot of people enjoy playing RP, thats good enough for me.

So it's not fact straight lines are lazy? countries with units that have 15/9 (genuine stats for a German unit) is not unbalanced? Countries given huge economic and reinf boosts? That is simply opinion/ Lolurdum

Escrito por Tundy, 12.09.2014 at 11:53

Is not about opinion, you can think RP is a good map, but is not.
Its a uncontested consensus in the map making community, that RP performs poorly in all aspects of map making.

Other map makers, including me: don't even recognize RP as a custom map, but just as default map with custom units. Why? Because there is no new borders, all of them are just copy paste of default map.

Meh what has a map got to do with it. People enjoy playing it because its fun for them. I don't give a shit what map making community thinks . People still enjoy playing on the default map as well. Just like RP there is nothing wrong in playing what you want to play. Just enjoy the game.

Escrito por Guest, 12.09.2014 at 12:04

So it's not fact straight lines are lazy? countries with units that have 15/9 (genuine stats for a German unit) is not unbalanced? Countries given huge economic and reinf boosts? That is simply opinion/ Lolurdum

Lol if this game started with RP as default you would have said the normal world map are crap ! You may think you wouldn't think so but believe me you would because you got accustomed to it.

Meh I just don't understand what all this hatred is about, if you don't like a map just don't play it. Let gamers enjoy what they love instead of trying to dictate what you think is right.

Besides there is nothing stopping you from making any map you like with any kind of unit you want and any extra rules you like. No matter how crappy you make a map I would would never care about it.