Drugs

Any of you guys ever had DMT, it's a rollercoaster for your brain hey

Nah...

No i only do heroin

Never tried it, but it is said by several spiritual/truth seekers, that if used responsibly, and just once, it can aid in spiritual growth by connecting your consciousness to the consciousness of others. It let's you see a larger perspective, and then from there, you begin exploring without the 'drug'.

(If you think of consciousness like a web browser, it's like being on another person's (or several people's) browser, visiting web pages from a place you've never seen, in a language you've never heard... if you think of consciousness in terms of virtual reality, it's like switching the VR from one 'game' to another 'game' or 'games' you've never played before.)

I only smoke weed other drugs are too expansive D

Escrito por Froyer, 25.05.2019 at 07:29

I only smoke weed other drugs are too expansive D

same

U are all amateurs for steve.. Acq is closest to him

Never done it personaly i just stick to weed

Escrito por Don, 25.05.2019 at 13:35

U are all amateurs for steve.. Acq is closest to him

Drugs are for losers incapable of having fun without altering their nervous system

Escrito por Alexis, 25.05.2019 at 15:24

Drugs are for losers incapable of having fun without altering their nervous system

t. Square

Escrito por Alexis, 25.05.2019 at 15:24

Drugs are for losers incapable of having fun without altering their nervous system

The true irony is that it's said by a Colombian

Escrito por Alexis, 25.05.2019 at 15:24

Drugs are for losers incapable of having fun without altering their nervous system

Escrito por Alexis, 25.05.2019 at 15:24

Drugs are for losers incapable of having fun without altering their nervous system

What is fun for you? I am not having that that type of fun...i have life forever

Escrito por Waffel, 25.05.2019 at 15:13

Escrito por Don, 25.05.2019 at 13:35

U are all amateurs for steve.. Acq is closest to him

ppl talk about weed and suddenly you are xx420blazemaster420

Escrito por 4nic, 26.05.2019 at 13:44

Escrito por Waffel, 25.05.2019 at 15:13

Escrito por Don, 25.05.2019 at 13:35

U are all amateurs for steve.. Acq is closest to him

ppl talk about weed and suddenly you are xx420blazemaster420

Did nobody give you attention again?

Escrito por Alexis, 25.05.2019 at 15:24

Drugs are for losers incapable of having fun without altering their nervous system

bro then dont sell it fucking colombian

Escrito por Waffel, 26.05.2019 at 13:56

Escrito por 4nic, 26.05.2019 at 13:44

Escrito por Waffel, 25.05.2019 at 15:13

Escrito por Don, 25.05.2019 at 13:35

U are all amateurs for steve.. Acq is closest to him

ppl talk about weed and suddenly you are xx420blazemaster420

Did nobody give you attention again?

no but that would be you, evaluating by this thread

Escrito por 4nic, 26.05.2019 at 14:25

no but that would be you, evaluating by this thread

Bro, you ok?

Stop being so obnoxious and starting a flamewar/fight with me every chance you get.

Escrito por Waffel, 26.05.2019 at 15:32

Escrito por 4nic, 26.05.2019 at 14:25

no but that would be you, evaluating by this thread

Bro, you ok?

Stop being so obnoxious and starting a flamewar/fight with me every chance you get.

Only if you start crying.

Escrito por 4nic, 26.05.2019 at 15:58

Escrito por Waffel, 26.05.2019 at 15:32

Bro, you ok?

Stop being so obnoxious and starting a flamewar/fight with me every chance you get.

Only if you start crying.

You two, stop this foreplay and kiss already!

I only play atWar, best drug I've had so far

Escrito por Froyer, 26.05.2019 at 14:03

then don't grow it

Alexis is the grower not the dealer you fucking dimwit

Escrito por Wheelo, 27.05.2019 at 08:01

Escrito por Froyer, 26.05.2019 at 14:03

then don't grow it

Alexis is the grower not the dealer you fucking dimwit

one of my friend do both why he cant ? D

Escrito por Froyer, 27.05.2019 at 08:08

---

Cos you can't do both in colombia
Unless you're part of the Medellin cartel

Escrito por Alexis, 25.05.2019 at 15:24

Drugs are for losers incapable of having fun without altering their nervous system

Matter of choice. Why to impose a "normality"?

Some very productive intelectuals and artists consume(d) drugs, ranging from marihuana to cocaine, from LSD to opiates... even booze.
Fun with drugs stops where they take control over the user... then he/she is screwed.
Rather than a "zero tolerance" and abstinence I would suggest a "sustainable use of drugs" (¡even a right to get high!). But this requires education and maturity.
Ofc. there are drugs, which are (almost) incompatible with a functional life. These have to be dealt with care.

Escrito por Columna Durruti, 27.05.2019 at 11:47

Matter of choice. Why to impose a "normality"?

Some very productive intelectuals and artists consume(d) drugs, ranging from marihuana to cocaine, from LSD to opiates... even booze.
Fun with drugs stops where they take control over the user... then he/she is screwed.
Rather than a "zero tolerance" and abstinence I would suggest a "sustainable use of drugs" (¡even a right to get high!). But this requires education and maturity.
Ofc. there are drugs, which are (almost) incompatible with a functional life. These have to be dealt with care.

I admit some drugs have been used for "inspiration" to a lot of artists since it gives a very different view of "reality" which reflex such beautiful things (80 % of Red Hot Chilli Peppers songs are about their experiences with drugs, and yet their music is so good), and even going deeper, native tribes from different parts of the world have been using them to "connect" with their gods and spirits, which as a matter of culture I don't see it as a "stupid thing". My actual point radicates in that the majority of citizens use them due to their incapability to physically and mentally develop themselves in a healthy way. Drugs have a lot of risks of long term, and, for me, it's not smart to run them just to have a 30 mins fun everyday.

Anyway I agree with you, drugs politics should be sustainable for people, no matter if their use is stupid or not, everyone has the right to do whatever they want with their lives and how to have fun.

Escrito por Alexis, 27.05.2019 at 12:45

Escrito por Columna Durruti, 27.05.2019 at 11:47

Matter of choice. Why to impose a "normality"?

Some very productive intelectuals and artists consume(d) drugs, ranging from marihuana to cocaine, from LSD to opiates... even booze.
Fun with drugs stops where they take control over the user... then he/she is screwed.
Rather than a "zero tolerance" and abstinence I would suggest a "sustainable use of drugs" (¡even a right to get high!). But this requires education and maturity.
Ofc. there are drugs, which are (almost) incompatible with a functional life. These have to be dealt with care.

I admit some drugs have been used for "inspiration" to a lot of artists since it gives a very different view of "reality" which reflex such beautiful things (80 % of Red Hot Chilli Peppers songs are about their experiences with drugs, and yet their music is so good), and even going deeper, native tribes from different parts of the world have been using them to "connect" with their gods and spirits, which as a matter of culture I don't see it as a "stupid thing". My actual point radicates in that the majority of citizens use them due to their incapability to physically and mentally develop themselves in a healthy way. Drugs have a lot of risks of long term, and, for me, it's not smart to run them just to have a 30 mins fun everyday.

Anyway I agree with you, drugs politics should be sustainable for people, no matter if their use is stupid or not, everyone has the right to do whatever they want with their lives and how to have fun.

Escrito por Columna Durruti, 27.05.2019 at 11:47

Matter of choice. Why to impose a "normality"?

Because 'normality' is a well-defined center point which everyone recognizes. It is NOT normal to be coked out, naked in the streets and screaming at 4am. It's not normal to be zoned out in a classroom. It's not normal to change your state of mind everyday to cope with problems.

Escrito por Columna Durruti, 27.05.2019 at 11:47

Some very productive intelectuals and artists consume(d) drugs, ranging from marihuana to cocaine, from LSD to opiates... even booze.

And a good majority of them are dead for that reason. It wasn't the drugs that gave them this ability. They achieved popularity through their talent and once they reach a level of fame, the drugs are offered. The drugs come AFTER the talent, not before. The drugs are usually a coping mechanism for childhood trauma. Look at the damage alcohol has done and still does.

Escrito por Columna Durruti, 27.05.2019 at 11:47

Fun with drugs stops where they take control over the user... then he/she is screwed.

But they almost always do. Either they have to go through years of hell and rehabilitation or they die. None of them come out clean and say "Yeah, I'm still swimming in mountains of cocaine like scarface OR celebrating their daily bottle of vodka habit" There are outliers who can cope but the masses cannot. Intellectuals aren't strong or smart enough to cope which is why most celebrate their sobriety.

Escrito por Columna Durruti, 27.05.2019 at 11:47

"Rather than a "zero tolerance" and abstinence I would suggest a "sustainable use of drugs" (¡even a right to get high!)."

Perfect! Don't deal with your issues or the causes of social dependence on a narcotic, lets just privatise drugs and let people buy them and get shit-faced.

Escrito por Columna Durruti, 27.05.2019 at 11:47

But this requires education and maturity.

Maturity would be addressing the conditions which cause people to seek drugs in the first place. The fundamental problem is a liberal democratic society that is utterly corrupt and in bed with cartels. Drugs are a form of control over a populace and a 'right to get high' society would be a capitalists wet dream. A society of individual hyper-consumers getting zoned out and incapable of addressing a radically changing world which gets more centralised by corporate internationalists year by year. Drugs are form of population control in every dystopian nightmare. There's a reason weed is legal and prevalent in North Korea.

-

Escrito por Alexis, 27.05.2019 at 12:45

80 % of Red Hot Chilli Peppers songs are about their experiences with drugs, and yet their music is so good

That's because they spent around 1000-10,000 hours into practising their instruments. The drugs have little effect on musical expression. They practice, they learn, they listen to others, they mimic and expand on it. It's not the drugs.

Escrito por Alexis, 27.05.2019 at 12:45

"native tribes from different parts of the world have been using them to "connect" with their gods and spirits"

And most of them practise cannibalism while living in a pre-civilization society where they practice self-harm and sacrifice.

Escrito por Alexis, 27.05.2019 at 12:45

My actual point radicates in that the majority of citizens use them due to their incapability to physically and mentally develop themselves in a healthy way.

But they don't, it just messes them up further. Most do these drugs to avoid their problems and just adds another issue on top of others.

Escrito por Alexis, 27.05.2019 at 12:45

"everyone has the right to do whatever they want with their lives and how to have fun"

But they don't and nor should they. This Liberal notion that we are all atomized individuals isn't true. Your poor choices affect everyone around you, they affect you, your family and your community. People have to pay for your poor choices and if we are to live in a society of welfare and socialised healthcare and other socialised mass-decisions making then you don't get to do as and when you please if others have to deal with it or pay for it.