A proposal for all

Im proposing new 3v3 maps

Eu+ is starting to get boring in 3v3 so i would like to propose 3v3 dreamworld,3v3 ancient,destoria ect.


The reason is that these are new maps and most of competitive players are not used with them so it will be kinda new thing.

Today i saw 3v3 in dreamland map and it was awesome. Like real strategy .

New things these make the game nore interesting. If you agree try to make more 3v3 in dream land, if not then you suck jk

Support, dreamworlds great. had some good 3v3s on it recently.

Support. Increase in variety is always interesting

Support. Please ban Europe+ or reduce the SP to 25%
(joking)

Escrito por clovis1122, 26.10.2014 at 18:08

Support. Please ban Europe+ or reduce the SP to 25%
(joking)

support

Too bad I retired from map making

I think a big problem is that Europe has such a fantastic dynamic compared to other maps and other parts of the world map. The existence of the Mediterranean acts as a shield between two different wars (e.g. Spain not joining in on Turkey & Ukraine so quickly) and therefore it keeps things mediated. I have been trying, for a while, to think of another area that can be used for 3v3s, but there is no place with a geographical feature which beats Europes, except the Caribbean which is too small and not very populated.

Escrito por KYBL, 26.10.2014 at 20:13

I think a big problem is that Europe has such a fantastic dynamic compared to other maps and other parts of the world map. The existence of the Mediterranean acts as a shield between two different wars (e.g. Spain not joining in on Turkey & Ukraine so quickly) and therefore it keeps things mediated. I have been trying, for a while, to think of another area that can be used for 3v3s, but there is no place with a geographical feature which beats Europes, except the Caribbean which is too small and not very populated.

east asia?

Escrito por KYBL, 26.10.2014 at 20:13

I think a big problem is that Europe has such a fantastic dynamic compared to other maps and other parts of the world map. The existence of the Mediterranean acts as a shield between two different wars (e.g. Spain not joining in on Turkey & Ukraine so quickly) and therefore it keeps things mediated. I have been trying, for a while, to think of another area that can be used for 3v3s, but there is no place with a geographical feature which beats Europes, except the Caribbean which is too small and not very populated.

He is right tho, but asia is unbalanced, middle east is to small for 3v3 if 10k. America alone is also little bit unbalanced in 10k. Maybe America + South america is possible.
Africa 3v3 is for me the most fun off all these I just put on. Oceania is also fun, but also big unbalanced.

I think we need to make presets of like Middle east with medditereanen and parts of africa and no india?
Just make the standard continents bit bigger and could be fun.

Rather than purpose a charge to default map, why dont you guys try make a new map? Come on! Leave default map in the past and use your awesome features for the present!

Escrito por clovis1122, 27.10.2014 at 07:09

Rather than purpose a charge to default map, why dont you guys try make a new map? Come on! Leave default map in the past and use your awesome features for the present!

Maybe if they are more balanced...?
Alot of those ''competitive 3v3 games'' like dreamworld or destoria idk the name, are not that quite balanced, just for example look Silverdrakia, thats way to OP compare to 80% of the countries, I have seen alot of 3v3's when Silverdrakia could manage 2v1 even sometimes 3v1 ..

I had beat Silverdrakia many times. However, Both bonker and chess would be happy to receive your feedback

Escrito por Skanderbeg, 27.10.2014 at 07:00

Create 50 states in North America and we can try competitive 3v3. Of course without Alaska and Hawaii, only CONUS.

Near East is also playable, i think there shouldnt be problem if Turkey, Egypt and Pakistan are included. Map is little smaller but thats good difference, intense gameplay.

Here is the issue with this: Population distribution

In a sovereign state, at least a modern one, people do not crowd the capital and leave the rest of the country empty. However, when a country divides itself up into regions, it's capital is generally where most of the population crowds, or it is already the only major city in the region and that is how the city is picked.

I would be willing to try and make a US map, but we will need a larger amount of area than the current US does in the default map.

Escrito por KYBL, 27.10.2014 at 17:05

Escrito por Skanderbeg, 27.10.2014 at 07:00

Create 50 states in North America and we can try competitive 3v3. Of course without Alaska and Hawaii, only CONUS.

Near East is also playable, i think there shouldnt be problem if Turkey, Egypt and Pakistan are included. Map is little smaller but thats good difference, intense gameplay.

Here is the issue with this: Population distribution

In a sovereign state, at least a modern one, people do not crowd the capital and leave the rest of the country empty. However, when a country divides itself up into regions, it's capital is generally where most of the population crowds, or it is already the only major city in the region and that is how the city is picked.

I would be willing to try and make a US map, but we will need a larger amount of area than the current US does in the default map.

This is not a issue of population, but of geography.

Besides, Europe has the best borders

I would rather play a 3v3 in a scaled map of the ussr, than in the states.

Escrito por Tundy, 27.10.2014 at 17:13

Escrito por KYBL, 27.10.2014 at 17:05

Escrito por Skanderbeg, 27.10.2014 at 07:00

Create 50 states in North America and we can try competitive 3v3. Of course without Alaska and Hawaii, only CONUS.

Near East is also playable, i think there shouldnt be problem if Turkey, Egypt and Pakistan are included. Map is little smaller but thats good difference, intense gameplay.

Here is the issue with this: Population distribution

In a sovereign state, at least a modern one, people do not crowd the capital and leave the rest of the country empty. However, when a country divides itself up into regions, it's capital is generally where most of the population crowds, or it is already the only major city in the region and that is how the city is picked.

I would be willing to try and make a US map, but we will need a larger amount of area than the current US does in the default map.

This is not a issue of population, but of geography.

Besides, Europe has the best borders

I would rather play a 3v3 in a scaled map of the ussr, than in the states.

I would argue that US geography is better than that of the USSR, considering that the Black Sea is pretty much useless, some of the areas would be so massive that you can't do shit with them, and the Caspian sea would be practically empty.

Escrito por clovis1122, 27.10.2014 at 07:50

I had beat Silverdrakia many times. However, Both bonker and chess would be happy to receive your feedback

I beat Clovistan with Strykoraine many times too!

Escrito por Professor Adog, 26.10.2014 at 20:02

Too bad I retired from map making

Don't worry bro, I will carry on your work on 3v3 isolation map <3

Escrito por KYBL, 27.10.2014 at 22:08

Escrito por Tundy, 27.10.2014 at 17:13

Escrito por KYBL, 27.10.2014 at 17:05

Escrito por Skanderbeg, 27.10.2014 at 07:00

Create 50 states in North America and we can try competitive 3v3. Of course without Alaska and Hawaii, only CONUS.

Near East is also playable, i think there shouldnt be problem if Turkey, Egypt and Pakistan are included. Map is little smaller but thats good difference, intense gameplay.

Here is the issue with this: Population distribution

In a sovereign state, at least a modern one, people do not crowd the capital and leave the rest of the country empty. However, when a country divides itself up into regions, it's capital is generally where most of the population crowds, or it is already the only major city in the region and that is how the city is picked.

I would be willing to try and make a US map, but we will need a larger amount of area than the current US does in the default map.

This is not a issue of population, but of geography.

Besides, Europe has the best borders

I would rather play a 3v3 in a scaled map of the ussr, than in the states.

I would argue that US geography is better than that of the USSR, considering that the Black Sea is pretty much useless, some of the areas would be so massive that you can't do shit with them, and the Caspian sea would be practically empty.

either way its just not exactly what we would be looking for, I think that US States would be more even for distribution of population and income as well as time to get to regions, USSR would just be massive and wouldnt work so well.

however the underlying issue here is that there are many options to start 3v3s on but it rarely happens because the bulk of EU+ 3v3 players enjoy the fact that they have EU+ memorized to the dot, so usually they wont be wanting to change maps all the time to new maps because then it involves relearning shit about expansions and stuff.

Side note: 3v3 WW2 CW:
Germany, Nippon-Manchuko-Siamese, Italia-Vichy VS USSR, Anglo-Frank-Afrika, Americo-Chinese
Encompasses most of ww2 teams into 3 players per team. good luck with 10 min turns

Escrito por clovis1122, 26.10.2014 at 18:08

Support. Please ban Europe+ or reduce the SP to 25%
(joking)

Escrito por Guest, 27.10.2014 at 00:50

These are the only maps we need to play.

my maps be kawaii. support

Then start hosting some.

I agree variation is needed. A bit of this and a bit of that. Enough memorization pls, the difference shows in these maps between the people who memorize moves and the ones who actually know how to play.


(mos safarden OP, trust me)


EDIT: Not saying EU shoudnt be played anymore, continue playing that too.

Bla

Dreamworld, Battlegrid, Foundation's Edge, etc. were created for competitive games.

Gonna make double euro+, one europe on top of another, flipped horizontally, fuck yeah balance

Escrito por notserral, 05.11.2014 at 17:14

Gonna make double euro+, one europe on top of another, flipped horizontally, fuck yeah balance

Escrito por notserral, 05.11.2014 at 17:14

Gonna make double euro+, one europe on top of another, flipped horizontally, fuck yeah balance

Isnt there already a kind of version like this? ;p

Escrito por Waffel, 06.11.2014 at 06:12

Escrito por notserral, 05.11.2014 at 17:14

Gonna make double euro+, one europe on top of another, flipped horizontally, fuck yeah balance

Isnt there already a kind of version like this? ;p

Yes there is, but flipped vertically!

Escrito por Columna Durruti, 06.11.2014 at 06:48

Escrito por Waffel, 06.11.2014 at 06:12

Escrito por notserral, 05.11.2014 at 17:14

Gonna make double euro+, one europe on top of another, flipped horizontally, fuck yeah balance

Isnt there already a kind of version like this? ;p

Yes there is, but flipped vertically!

Ahh

Escrito por Columna Durruti, 06.11.2014 at 06:48

Escrito por Waffel, 06.11.2014 at 06:12

Escrito por notserral, 05.11.2014 at 17:14

Gonna make double euro+, one europe on top of another, flipped horizontally, fuck yeah balance

Isnt there already a kind of version like this? ;p

Yes there is, but flipped vertically!

oh where is it ??

Escrito por notserral, 06.11.2014 at 12:43

oh where is it ??

Here is the original forum post: https://atwar-game.com/forum/topic.php?topic_id=13440
Here should be the map (doesn't load; does it still exist?): http://atwar-game.com/map/?id=6909
I'm afraid it was deleted by Clovek himself.