A peace killing

after icemeker abckstabbed me he took my capital when we were allies and when he started war i just lost without a chance to take it back...
is that sort of a bug ?

If you had an empty capital, he can take it. then you can lose while at peace, you have to break peace and then take your capita back.

Escrito por nonames, 30.06.2012 at 11:00

If you had an empty capital, he can take it. then you can lose while at peace, you have to break peace and then take your capita back.

i broke the ally the min i saw he is backstabbing me...
then the peace but after i broke the peace i was dead already

Escrito por babisili, 30.06.2012 at 12:35

Lol that is gonna look bad on icemaker biography.

^^

Why ivan and Amok arent responding ?(and babisili i also have a picture of him SP farming)

I guess thats not a bug, but unfairness at highest level

Escrito por Tzeentch, 30.06.2012 at 14:46

I guess thats not a bug, but unfairness at highest level

i am not talking about the backstabbing.
talking about the fact that we were at peace and i just lost

Taking the empty cap, nothing happens (for the winning conditions), when allied
ending the Ally, 1 week peace and first week counting for the 2 turns without cap
declaring war, 2 weeks without caps, game over.

still i dont believe this is a bug, maybe a game mechanic not intended, like TB was.

Escrito por Tzeentch, 01.07.2012 at 00:15

Taking the empty cap, nothing happens (for the winning conditions), when allied
ending the Ally, 1 week peace and first week counting for the 2 turns without cap
declaring war, 2 weeks without caps, game over.

still i dont believe this is a bug, maybe a game mechanic not intended, like TB was.

I also thought about it. but idk what it is and even if its not a bug its unfair and needs to be fixed. cuz the player dont even have a chance to recape because he is still in peace.

Escrito por ShaiBB, 01.07.2012 at 03:07

I also thought about it. but idk what it is and even if its not a bug its unfair and needs to be fixed. cuz the player dont even have a chance to recape because he is still in peace.

I agree, but on the otherhand, its easy to prevent, just never leave your cap empty, 1 militia holds against masses of Allies ;-)

Escrito por Tzeentch, 01.07.2012 at 03:13

Escrito por ShaiBB, 01.07.2012 at 03:07

I also thought about it. but idk what it is and even if its not a bug its unfair and needs to be fixed. cuz the player dont even have a chance to recape because he is still in peace.

I agree, but on the otherhand, its easy to prevent, just never leave your cap empty, 1 militia holds against masses of Allies ;-)

yes but why should I do that insted of just someone beeing a good ally. i dont need to play the game and to always look that im not getting backstabbed.

Escrito por Tzeentch, 01.07.2012 at 15:06

There are so many backstaber, so it must be something great which i cant understand

Doesnt matter still needs to be fixed

Backstabbing and politics are part of the game.

I've lost games because the guy I was fighting managed to convince my ally to change sides. (I try to make a point of defeating the backstabbing git on my way down, but that's beside the point!) I'm not crying over it since I've been on the other side of the alliance as well. If you want a game where people don't back-stab, play a team game (or maybe chess). The free-for-alls are just that.

My personal pet peeve is people who ally with everyone, or close as. I tend to see that as an 'enhanced peace' and treat it accordingly when I reach their borders. If they only have 1 or 2 allies inc me, I will often fight to the death to defend them.

Escrito por Cynar, 03.07.2012 at 14:16

Backstabbing and politics are part of the game.

I've lost games because the guy I was fighting managed to convince my ally to change sides. (I try to make a point of defeating the backstabbing git on my way down, but that's beside the point!) I'm not crying over it since I've been on the other side of the alliance as well. If you want a game where people don't back-stab, play a team game (or maybe chess). The free-for-alls are just that.

My personal pet peeve is people who ally with everyone, or close as. I tend to see that as an 'enhanced peace' and treat it accordingly when I reach their borders. If they only have 1 or 2 allies inc me, I will often fight to the death to defend them.

what tzen said is true ... its also not about crying its about why should i do without trying to get my cap back ? does that seem fair ?

DONT GRY ITS ONLY A GAME

Escrito por veselin28, 06.07.2012 at 12:33

DONT GRY ITS ONLY A GAME

im not crying ... im saying that its not fair that i got no chance taking my cap back

COOL ICE FUCKED YOUR game +1 rep to him MUHAHAHAHAHA

Escrito por ShaiBB, 06.07.2012 at 14:16

Escrito por veselin28, 06.07.2012 at 12:33

DONT GRY ITS ONLY A GAME

im not crying ... im saying that its not fair that i got no chance taking my cap back

you are crying

ShaiBB dont discuss, some player just win with backstabbing, ignore/enemylist and thats it.

btw just one Coalition here saying you cry.. interessting.

Escrito por Tzeentch, 07.07.2012 at 05:37

ShaiBB dont discuss, some player just win with backstabbing, ignore/enemylist and thats it.

btw just one Coalition here saying you cry.. interessting.

lol you are so right

Escrito por YazanTheSexy, 07.07.2012 at 05:18

Escrito por ShaiBB, 06.07.2012 at 14:16

Escrito por veselin28, 06.07.2012 at 12:33

DONT GRY ITS ONLY A GAME

im not crying ... im saying that its not fair that i got no chance taking my cap back

you are crying

wow your anoob...
and the guy from the dutch clan is right tzee is right

Enough.