Make Infantry Units pure defensive Units

Escrito por ROYAL, 01.11.2015 at 14:37

Escrito por Evic, 01.11.2015 at 14:35

Escrito por ROYAL, 01.11.2015 at 14:32

Most 3v3 players dont play world map?
Did you do that hard hitting data research in your ass?

By world map i ment entire world map, not just small part of it such as EU+ (since you clearly said 3v3 players play on 200+ countries)

Why dont we do some research and find out whether or not this is true. I'm willing to bet that a majority of 3v3 players (Proficient,) play full world map.

They doesn't....

Anyway why you guys are arguing about that here? xD

Escrito por clovis1122, 01.11.2015 at 14:40

Escrito por ROYAL, 01.11.2015 at 14:37

Escrito por Evic, 01.11.2015 at 14:35

Escrito por ROYAL, 01.11.2015 at 14:32

Most 3v3 players dont play world map?
Did you do that hard hitting data research in your ass?

By world map i ment entire world map, not just small part of it such as EU+ (since you clearly said 3v3 players play on 200+ countries)

Why dont we do some research and find out whether or not this is true. I'm willing to bet that a majority of 3v3 players (Proficient,) play full world map.

They doesn't....

Anyway why you guys are arguing about that here? xD

I dont even know. it started when virus were bashing on 3v3 players.

There are two types of 3v3 players:

'competitive': memorize the map, strategies, expansions, and rushes. Probably about 30% or less of us.
competitive: no memorization, and they adapt to every map and play various maps. Most of the competitive world.

When generalizing 3v3 players you ought to use the majority generalization or say ''3v3 players that memorize'' or else it creates a lot of confusion. Besides, I'm personally offended when someone considers most 3v3 players memorizers (even though this is indeed a big issue, and I have voiced my opinion against it several times).

Now back to the topic: It's pretty clear this won't happen.

Surely in a scenario game, or any other map there are a certain number of countries to choose, and certain strategies you can pick which will give you however many different expansion types, this is a fact for any game so okay a few times and of course you know and practice expansion, but this can be done on any map

Also, no support, the game is not about stacking inf and getting bigger stack, nerfing pd is bad idea, it is strategy and saying whoever has biggest stack wins is bullshit, don't rush p d stacks is simple answer

Escrito por ROYAL, 01.11.2015 at 14:32

Escrito por Evic, 01.11.2015 at 14:30

Escrito por ROYAL, 01.11.2015 at 14:20

Compare that to the world map. Over 200 different countries with different money options 3k, 5k , 10k, 25k, 50k
Each money options with countless different strategies and tactics and memorization to do.

How is the world map any different from your scenarios or maps? It isn't, all of it involves memorization even if it is to DIFFERING extents.

Stop trying to glorify the scenarios and custom maps that you all are biased for.

AND YES IM BIASED TOWARDS EUROPE. WE ARE ALL BIASED.

Trying to have this attitude that 3v3 europe is SHIT without Acknowledging the commonality shared between 3v3 EU and the maps YOU like is the most bullshit thing i've ever seen.

First off i never said 3v3s are shit, dont put words into my mouth!

Second of all, most of 3v3 players dont play world map, thats a fact,also most of games played are 10k with few 5k and 3k.

Its easy to memorize expansions,shortcuts,tricks on a map with 100 cities (im taking a shot in the dark, dunno exactly how many cities it has) when its usually played on same income and same settings

Most 3v3 players dont play world map?
Did you do that hard hitting data research in your ass?

Indeed, all maps become all about memorising at some point. But many (ok, not many, but some) people stop playing those maps when they end up just memorisation. I personally stopped playing WW1 when that happened. Also, I have no idea what medieval Japan and Vietnam map you were talking about since no map of that kind has been played enough to become a memorisation issue.

Escrito por Htin, 31.10.2015 at 05:57

In most war infantry is the most basic troop

thats my point, i dont count supporting units but that is around 20% or 30% of all units on the map, most games are just stacks of infantry and make as much walls as u can, very boring, and very imaginative, some players remind me on spiders that r netting webs, this game need much more complex ways for battles, and infantry if its defensive units dont need to have attack 4 but 1, it should be 1/6 and attacking units should have attack, like tanks, cavalry, marines etc

Escrito por MURAD IV, 07.11.2015 at 13:47

Escrito por Htin, 31.10.2015 at 05:57

In most war infantry is the most basic troop

thats my point, i dont count supporting units but that is around 20% or 30% of all units on the map, most games are just stacks of infantry and make as much walls as u can, very boring, and very imaginative, some players remind me on spiders that r netting webs, this game need much more complex ways for battles, and infantry if its defensive units dont need to have attack 4 but 1, it should be 1/6 and attacking units should have attack, like tanks, cavalry, marines etc

so make all strats more like ra you say?

No, just make other units useful

Units become useful depending on the strat that's used, more strats are needed, to spice things up but changing the basic units is a quick way to disestablish all the strats in one go.
and that would be a bollocks moment.

Changing one unit to what it supposed to be wouldnt destroy all strategies, just would destry boring noob play, build infantry, build wall, build infantry, build wall, build infantry, build wall, very interesting............

Escrito por MURAD IV, 08.11.2015 at 16:53

No, just make other units useful

Kek, i'm beating you with pure stealths and only a little inf.

Here is my input.



NO NO NO NO NO


NO NO