Hillary Clinton calls for new Iran sanctions due to missile test

WTF, I thought shes running for US president, not for queen of Saudi Arabia?!

They violated the nuclear agreement they made, they should be expecting airstrikes, not bullshit sanctions

Escrito por Viruslegion, 17.01.2016 at 00:08

They violated the nuclear agreement they made, they should be expecting airstrikes, not bullshit sanctions

lol,what if they are testing nukes ?

Missiles arent a part of the nuclear agreement.

Escrito por Tirpitz406, 17.01.2016 at 07:32

Missiles arent a part of the nuclear agreement.

http://freebeacon.com/national-security/congress-iran-missile-tests-violating-nuclear-deal/

Escrito por Viruslegion, 17.01.2016 at 00:08

They violated the nuclear agreement they made, they should be expecting airstrikes, not bullshit sanctions

WHose account was this D=

Escrito por Viruslegion, 17.01.2016 at 11:48

Escrito por Tirpitz406, 17.01.2016 at 07:32

Missiles arent a part of the nuclear agreement.

http://freebeacon.com/national-security/congress-iran-missile-tests-violating-nuclear-deal/

fun fact
freedom and national security are on opposite ends of the scale,

Escrito por Pheonixking929, 17.01.2016 at 17:50

Escrito por Viruslegion, 17.01.2016 at 00:08

They violated the nuclear agreement they made, they should be expecting airstrikes, not bullshit sanctions

WHose account was this D=

do you mean who made the thread?

Escrito por Viruslegion, 18.01.2016 at 00:14

Escrito por Pheonixking929, 17.01.2016 at 17:50

Escrito por Viruslegion, 17.01.2016 at 00:08

They violated the nuclear agreement they made, they should be expecting airstrikes, not bullshit sanctions

WHose account was this D=

do you mean who made the thread?

Yes. I see why my question would be confusing now :x

Escrito por For Antioch, 18.01.2016 at 08:22

Escrito por Pheonixking929, 18.01.2016 at 07:17

Escrito por Viruslegion, 18.01.2016 at 00:14

Escrito por Pheonixking929, 17.01.2016 at 17:50

Escrito por Viruslegion, 17.01.2016 at 00:08

They violated the nuclear agreement they made, they should be expecting airstrikes, not bullshit sanctions

WHose account was this D=

do you mean who made the thread?

Yes. I see why my question would be confusing now :x

I thought it was andertes/pavle

it was

As Tirp said, Irans missile tests did NOT violate the nuclear agreement, get your facts straight. Alot of people are gunning and propagandizing against the Iran-USA deal, namely the oil corporations, the tea party, Saudi and hell Isis herself among others.

This deal is in the best interest of Usa citizens and the international community as a whole, i really cant understand how conservative normal Americans are against it. What are they even thinking? Are they thinking at all?

And as for war with Iran, you can just forget it. To take on Iran, you need boots on the ground and thats a whole new Vietnam waiting to happen. Gonna laugh my ass off if this actually happens.

Escrito por Khal.eesi, 18.01.2016 at 17:03

As Tirp said, Irans missile tests did NOT violate the nuclear agreement, more like an irrelevant un security counsil resolution, get your facts straight. Alot of people are gunning and propagandizing against the Iran-USA deal, namely the oil corporations, the tea party, Saudi and hell Isis herself among others.

This deal is in the best interest of Usa citizens and the international community as a whole, i really cant understand how conservative normal Americans are against it. What are they even thinking? Are they thinking at all?

And as for war with Iran, you can just forget it. To take on Iran, you need boots on the ground and thats a whole new Vietnam waiting to happen. Gonna laugh my ass off if this actually happens.

i was trying to be funny with this bla xd

Escrito por Kromn, 18.01.2016 at 17:07

Escrito por Khal.eesi, 18.01.2016 at 17:03

As Tirp said, Irans missile tests did NOT violate the nuclear agreement, more like an irrelevant un security counsil resolution, get your facts straight. Alot of people are gunning and propagandizing against the Iran-USA deal, namely the oil corporations, the tea party, Saudi and hell Isis herself among others.

This deal is in the best interest of Usa citizens and the international community as a whole, i really cant understand how conservative normal Americans are against it. What are they even thinking? Are they thinking at all?

And as for war with Iran, you can just forget it. To take on Iran, you need boots on the ground and thats a whole new Vietnam waiting to happen. Gonna laugh my ass off if this actually happens.

i was trying to be funny with this bla xd

i was commenting on the thread as a whole..bla

Escrito por Khal.eesi, 18.01.2016 at 17:03

I really cant understand how conservative normal Americans are against it. What are they even thinking?

MUH ISRUL! DEM IRANIANS ARE ANTI-ISRUL!

It's not normal conservatives who care. It's Israeli lobbying. Average conservatives are giving less and less of a damn about Israel every year. Cruz tried pushing the 'muh israel' bullshit during a conference and got booed.

Escrito por Tik-Tok, 22.01.2016 at 08:36

Escrito por Khal.eesi, 18.01.2016 at 17:03

It's not normal conservatives who care. It's Israeli lobbying. Average conservatives are giving less and less of a damn about Israel every year.

it's that and the people who realize that muslims shouldn't be allowed to have anything that goes boom

Escrito por Tik-Tok, 22.01.2016 at 08:36

Escrito por Khal.eesi, 18.01.2016 at 17:03

I really cant understand how conservative normal Americans are against it. What are they even thinking?

MUH ISRUL! DEM IRANIANS ARE ANTI-ISRUL!

It's not normal conservatives who care. It's Israeli lobbying. Average conservatives are giving less and less of a damn about Israel every year. Cruz tried pushing the 'muh israel' bullshit during a conference and got booed.

Oh but it is. Normal everyday conservative americans are against the deal, just because they dont like muslims and democrats. Its stupid. Talk about feelings getting in the way of rational decisions. And the whole republican party was lobbying hand to hand with the Jews against the deal, along with 200 Us army generals who signed a petition, most of them conservative offcourse. Face it, the right wingers are just Israel little dogs, dancing on command. Obama , even though he gets tons of shit from everybody, he at least did not make another war and made a good deal that annoyed all the wrong people, corporations, Jews, Saudis and Us conservatives. I d say that was a good run.

Escrito por Viruslegion, 22.01.2016 at 11:30

it's that and the people who realize that muslims shouldn't be allowed to have anything that goes boom

Im not one to defend muslims but you kind of have it wrong.

1. Muslims already have nuclears. And not just any muslim, but the single worst kind there is. Pakistanis.
2. You cant have an absolute authority to decide on whose to have nuclear weapons and whose not. Especially if you are USA, since you know, over the last 50 years only America and third world dictatorships are still actually going to war.
3. There wasnt really any other alternative. You cant just make a country stop its nuclear and ballistic programs by force. Unless you conquer them.


Also Irans missile reach covers all the good places like Saudi, Israel, Turkey and stops before Europe. Why care that much?

Escrito por Khal.eesi, 22.01.2016 at 12:03

Face it, the right wingers are just Israel little dogs, dancing on command.

Obama , even though he gets tons of shit from everybody, he at least did not make another war

Other than annihilating Libya and funding, arming and continuing to supply ISIS... Obama has been a bigger warmonger than Bush by a long shot. More arms deals have been approved by Obama than any president since WWII.

You need to face it, left wingers are as poisonous as the false conservatives.

The biggest worry with Iran wanting nuclear weapons is that its neighbors will want them. I use to not care but a nuclear middle eastern arms race is not a wonderful thought.

Escrito por Khal.eesi, 22.01.2016 at 12:16

Escrito por Viruslegion, 22.01.2016 at 11:30

Also Irans missile reach covers all the good places like Saudi, Israel, Turkey and stops before Europe. Why care that much?

Tik pretty summed up why I care so much, because of a possible nuclear arms race in the middle east

Escrito por Tik-Tok, 22.01.2016 at 12:30

Other than annihilating Libya and funding, arming and continuing to supply ISIS... Obama has been a bigger warmonger than Bush by a long shot. More arms deals have been approved by Obama than any president since WWII.

You need to face it, left wingers are as poisonous as the false conservatives.

The biggest worry with Iran wanting nuclear weapons is that its neighbors will want them. I use to not care but a nuclear middle eastern arms race is not a wonderful thought.

Yeah he is not great obviously, we are talking about the US president and his administration and the rotten insitution of congress. In my eyes its all about who causes less damage and ends his term having left some positive impact, in which i think Obama did better than any other conservative did.

As for the Middle East nuclear race that worries me too, but just a little. But as i said Iran already made the decision to go that way, so it was either war or deal, no other alternative. That being said as a South European citizen i dont give much shit about whats going on in the middle east, except for educational purposes. I dont suffer from Iranian Shiites, but i do suffer from American interventionism and European institution corruption. I would love if Nato and USA stop fucking interfering where they dont belong. They should let the Middle East work their stuff alone, its none of our business. Same with Europe, where they help Turkey against Greece and Albania against Serbia? I dont like it.