09.07.2011 - 13:32
Would anyone like to have significate names for their numbered ranks. for ex; Rank 1 = Novice Rank 2 = Beginner Rank 3 = Cadet Rank 4 = Minor Rank 5 = Officer Rank 6 = Private Rank 7 = Corporal Rank 8 = Sergeant Rank 9 = Lieutenant Rank 10 = Captain Rank 11 = Major Rank 12 = Colonel Rank 13 = General Rank 14 = Marshall Rank 15 = Afterwind I think this would be fun to have as a new feature in this game. Of course, the order of the ranks can be changed according to preference or actual military rankings. Does anyone else agree with me?
---- Don't trust the manipulative rabbit.
Carregando...
Carregando...
|
|
09.07.2011 - 13:57
I love te idea, but maybe something more like this: 1=Private 2=Corporal 3=Sergeant 4=Staff sergeant 5=Master sergeant 6=Warrant officer 7=Lieutenant 8=Captain 9=Major 10=Colonel 11=Admiral 12=Marshal 13=Brigadier 14=General 15=Legend Theres also the possibility of more ranks being added and requirement for the currents lowered (I wish lol) But it would be nice to have what you said done. The only thing I dont like is the first few ranks you stated seem uneeded, maybe we should have tiers just like american/british armys? For example, 1-5 be begginer, 6-10 be officer, 10-14 be uhh....commander? and 15 be legend. Another thing, how about earning different colours for your sheild (next to your name in the lobby)? For example, begginer is orange, officer is blue, commander is green, legend is purple? Well that was my 20 cents.
Carregando...
Carregando...
|
|
09.07.2011 - 14:57
No, it would be awfully cliché. I'd rather not be able to draw comparisons between Afterwind and America's Army, thank you.
---- YOBA:
Youth-Oriented, Bydło-Approved
Carregando...
Carregando...
|
|
09.07.2011 - 15:49
Wow that sucks then. I would be honored to have the same names for the strongest military in history for a list of ranks in a game, because co,ing up with new ones leads to stupid results. rororo Seriously though- what other military can you think of that has names globally known for ranks? maybe the romans? the brits? MAYBE the russians? or how about a mix of all of them?
Carregando...
Carregando...
|
|
09.07.2011 - 17:42
I'm thinking of free upgrades when you move up in rank. Maybe something as small as improved view range early on, but how about bigger rare-unit chances when a high rank is achieved, if rare units are allowed?
---- "There was Eru, the One, who in Arda is called Ilúvatar and he made first the Ainur, the Holy Ones, that were the offspring of his thought, and they were with him before aught else was made." -The Silmarillion
Carregando...
Carregando...
|
|
09.07.2011 - 18:17
300 spartans 700 thespians thousands of persians still better kill/loss rate
---- Afterwind Summer 1v1 Tournament Final Victory With music and annotation Afterwind Autumn/Winter 2v2 Tournament Final Victory Only music this time
Carregando...
Carregando...
|
|
09.07.2011 - 18:21
lol, true that. But in the end, you can't deny that America is the strongest
Carregando...
Carregando...
|
|
10.07.2011 - 15:50
Cool idea i sort mixed normal ranks with military ranks during the first few. Thanks
---- Don't trust the manipulative rabbit.
Carregando...
Carregando...
|
|
10.07.2011 - 18:26
>Implying murrica doesn't own britain
Carregando...
Carregando...
|
|
Carregando...
Carregando...
|
|
15.07.2011 - 08:20
There's only ever been one truly "global" empire and it's the British. Claiming anything else is just trolling up your arse.
---- Hello, I listen to Shakira and Rihanna and I support the multiculturalisation of Europe : )
Carregando...
Carregando...
|
|
15.07.2011 - 14:59
French empire, Indochina and Caribbean islands with Africa in the middle? y so selfhate
---- Afterwind Summer 1v1 Tournament Final Victory With music and annotation Afterwind Autumn/Winter 2v2 Tournament Final Victory Only music this time
Carregando...
Carregando...
|
|
15.07.2011 - 15:51
Not on the scale of the Britsh empire. Here's a terrific wikipedia page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_empires#All_empires_at_their_greatest_extent The British were the largest in terms of population, size and global repartition. By far.
---- Hello, I listen to Shakira and Rihanna and I support the multiculturalisation of Europe : )
Carregando...
Carregando...
|
|
15.07.2011 - 16:11
Yes, but they had no Revolution. They just exploited half civilized savages while the French were fighting for liberty equality fraternity. Also no wines. FRANCE STRONG
---- Afterwind Summer 1v1 Tournament Final Victory With music and annotation Afterwind Autumn/Winter 2v2 Tournament Final Victory Only music this time
Carregando...
Carregando...
|
|
15.07.2011 - 16:59
Actually, all of these Empires are pussies. Only the USA can be considered "STRONG". The USA was the only great power to enter a war with other great powers (WW2, WW1 to a lesser extent) and, well, remain top dog. France, Britain and other shitty imperialist countries like that picked on savages who had no experience of combatting firearms at the time they were colonised. They really didn't stand a chance*. Unlikewise, the USA always fought countries that were on an equal footing--Mexico, Spain in the Philippines and obviously Germany in Europe. I can only conclude that USA #1 BITCHES!!! Because the USA always wins in the end, (a part of) Korea survived as a capitalist nation, natives in the Midwest have been practically eradicated since 1812 and Vietnam now exports textiles and stuff to the USA like crazy. *Ethiopia excepted because Italy cannot into overseas wars, Mysore excepted because the Tiger of Mysore was a rad dude like that.
---- YOBA:
Youth-Oriented, Bydło-Approved
Carregando...
Carregando...
|
Você tem certeza?