Novas publicações

It would be nice to be able to save a moves while in the process of making them. In our casual games, moves can sometimes take over a hour to do. The "Save" button (like the existing one that can be used after you've ended your move) would be ideal as you can put in 15 minutes here, 15 minutes there and so on, without having to end your turn in hoping that everyone else doesn't do so. It shouldn't be an auto-save though, as it is still nice to be able to exit out to undo any moves without saving when you're trying to weigh out options.

Citação:

"What"? Stop acting like you haven't heard about the FBI reports that Trump supporters are planning on assassinating Congressmen. If both CNN and Fox are reporting this, then it shouldn't be a conspiratorial subject. The question is "how" severe the damage will be, not "whether" there will be an impending attack.

Ok

Escrito por Khauman, 13.01.2021 at 09:51

Escrito por KhilafahSharia, 13.01.2021 at 09:36

We are 1 week away from the "inauguration". I bet that the Million Militia Match will bring at least 70000-100000 Trump supporters with guns to Washington, enough to stall if not overturn the inauguration.

What

"What"? Stop acting like you haven't heard about the FBI reports that Trump supporters are planning on assassinating Congressmen. If both CNN and Fox are reporting this, then it shouldn't be a conspiratorial subject. The question is "how" severe the damage will be, not "whether" there will be an impending attack.

I beat mecoy
https://prnt.sc/wto949
https://lichess.org/Zbaici9h

Evet

Escrito por Richthofen, 15.01.2021 at 23:49

Can we at least get IF militia 1 range just enough to wall lol

Can we at least get IF militia 1 range just enough to wall lol

Escrito por George Bush, 15.01.2021 at 22:24

Escrito por sirivann, 15.01.2021 at 22:23

We already have enough strats for stealths, need a missile unit for ships to carry and fire!!!!

GW, MOS.

2/13 strat is too much? Besides this won't make NC a stealth strat. It's still primarily an infantry/ship spam strat with stealth as an option.

and CO , thats 3 strats specificly designed for stealths, we need missilesssssss launched by nc shipssssssssss

Noice

Escrito por sirivann, 15.01.2021 at 22:23

We already have enough strats for stealths, need a missile unit for ships to carry and fire!!!!

GW, MOS. HW

3/13 strat is too much? Besides this won't make NC a stealth strat. It's still primarily an infantry/ship spam strat with stealth as an option.

We already have enough strats for stealths, need a missile unit for ships to carry and fire!!!!

Did you ever hear the Tragedy of Darth ●Lelouch the wise? I thought not. It's not a story the Mods would tell you. It's an Atwar legend. Darth ●Lelouch was a Dark Lord of Atwar, so powerful and so wise he could use his units to influence walls outside their range.
He had such a knowledge of the dark side of Atwar, that he could even keep the ones he cared about from losing elo. The dark side of the Atwar is a pathway to many abilities some consider to be unnatural like Rewalling and Serb-Walling. He became so powerful... the only thing he was afraid of was losing his elo, which eventually, of course, he did. Unfortunately, he taught his apprentice everything he knew, then his apprentice stole his elo in his sleep. It's ironic he could save others from losing elo, but not himself.

Escrito por Richthofen, 15.01.2021 at 21:02

For the people who thinks it's underpowered: just remember you have viable options to expand. Helicopters do not have any attack restrictions. +8 vs infs +7 vs militia. With helicopters capacity upgrade can also carry that one 40 cost marine.

To those who thinks it's overpowered , less transport capacity and less attack options.

It's balanced in my eyes

Edit: spamming marines is just like spamming pd or imp infantry. Relatively same attack and defense and cost

pd inf 50 cost

these marines, 40 cost. 20% cheaper is a massive difference.

For the people who thinks it's underpowered: just remember you have viable options to expand. Helicopters do not have any attack restrictions. +8 vs infs +7 vs militia. With helicopters capacity upgrade can also carry that one 40 cost marine.

To those who thinks it's overpowered , less transport capacity and less attack options.

It's balanced in my eyes

Edit: spamming marines is just like spamming pd or imp infantry. Relatively same attack and defense and cost

I am lelouch and I approve this message

Since RA, MOS, SM, Blitz all got buffed, can we take a look at buffing NC? I feel that NC is getting power-creeped and needs a little buff.

I think a good buff for NC is to reduce their marine cost by an additional 30.
This would give NC a slight buff that it needs to stay relevant.

With this, NC marines will cost 120 which is as much as tanks. This would give NC a more viable ground attack unit than NC tanks which are god-awful. I also think buffing NC marines also fits the theme of naval commander. Marines sync well with NC submarines and people think of marines as a "naval operations" kind of unit.

Escrito por Acquiesce, 15.01.2021 at 18:53

Whichever one Boywind takes

Boywind would take them all if he could.

I would play it if inf had 4 attack so you could actually expand t1 in West

Whichever one Boywind takes

Hey learster, good to see you're still alive.

If you're a highrank you really have no excuse for not knowing how to forum quote properly by now.

Escrito por George Bush, 15.01.2021 at 15:45

Escrito por sirivann, 15.01.2021 at 15:15

Escrito por George Bush, 15.01.2021 at 14:42

Escrito por sirivann, 15.01.2021 at 09:53

Wow a england where its ports arent ports at all xaxaxaxa

Yea how historically inaccurate. Just like how the German Reich invaded and took over England in 1942 while deep within Barbarossa and the United States has to recapture a British city within 3 weeks or all of India and the Middle East will quit the war.

oh is englands cities not being ports suppoed too stop germany invasion? , is it supposed to stop u as USA from just atacking the 1 unwalled city while expecting germany not to stack it? xaxaxaxaxaxa

If I could I would make uk un-takable

flashbacks to the other ww2 version of uk with no go zones, fortified ports and being owned by usa xaxaxa

Escrito por sirivann, 15.01.2021 at 15:15

Escrito por George Bush, 15.01.2021 at 14:42

Escrito por sirivann, 15.01.2021 at 09:53

Wow a england where its ports arent ports at all xaxaxaxa

Yea how historically inaccurate. Just like how the German Reich invaded and took over England in 1942 while deep within Barbarossa and the United States has to recapture a British city within 3 weeks or all of India and the Middle East will quit the war.

oh is englands cities not being ports suppoed too stop germany invasion? , is it supposed to stop u as USA from just atacking the 1 unwalled city while expecting germany not to stack it? xaxaxaxaxaxa

If I could I would make uk un-takable

Just bought 1, Jesus will guide the way! Tbh I'm in it for the trophy and not the protocoins, hahah

Escrito por George Bush, 15.01.2021 at 14:42

Escrito por sirivann, 15.01.2021 at 09:53

Wow a england where its ports arent ports at all xaxaxaxa

Yea how historically inaccurate. Just like how the German Reich invaded and took over England in 1942 while deep within Barbarossa and the United States has to recapture a British city within 3 weeks or all of India and the Middle East will quit the war.

oh is englands cities not being ports suppoed too stop germany invasion? , is it supposed to stop u as USA from just atacking the 1 unwalled city while expecting germany not to stack it? xaxaxaxaxaxa

Escrito por WHlTE, 14.01.2021 at 22:14

Escrito por ITSGG1122, 14.01.2021 at 17:58

Escrito por WHlTE, 14.01.2021 at 16:09

Escrito por ITSGG1122, 14.01.2021 at 15:56

Escrito por WHlTE, 14.01.2021 at 14:53

Escrito por ITSGG1122, 14.01.2021 at 14:30

Escrito por WHlTE, 14.01.2021 at 11:15

Escrito por ITSGG1122, 14.01.2021 at 08:31

Escrito por WHlTE, 13.01.2021 at 21:35

Escrito por DeepFriedUnicorn, 08.01.2021 at 17:04

Escrito por Philsfromthesoul, 08.01.2021 at 16:55

Escrito por DeepFriedUnicorn, 08.01.2021 at 16:50

Escrito por Philsfromthesoul, 08.01.2021 at 14:13

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO YOU CAN'T WALK INTO THE CAPITOL FOR A FEW HOURS! WHAT ABOUT MY WHOLESOME SENATOR? YOU'RE LITERALLY TRYING TO START A COUP!

Guns, people die because of the guns the trump supporters used, ladder, battering rams, paintball guns and forcefully entering into somewhere were elected officials work.

Totally not a third world country action at all. Oh no no, totally not.....

in a third world shithole (like Ireland) the docile people sit there and consume while rich people in government rob them

Trump is a billionaire and keeps giving money to Israel and keeps provoking your own democracy... Hypocritical mate...

Trumps net worth has dropped ever since he entered office, ""democracy"" america is ruled by lobbyists, each senator/congressman/president needs to favour the lobbyists to attract funds and not get attacked by the media, America isnt a "democracy" whatever president you pick, whatever congressmen you pick, whatever senator you pick they push their agenda.

So do you suggest that his nett worth dropped because of his presidency or is there another correlated factor? Such as the coronapandemic?
When the pandemic is over, dont u think his nett worth will be increased back to pre- pandemic levels?

I still dont get how youre assuming that his presidency affected his net worth.
Shouldnt there be other factors that affect his assets etc.
You do know he wasnt president before 2016 and his nett worth dropped massively as well.

I would even suggest that his nett worth benefitted from his presidency, and it didnt decline further due to his presidency.

He cant run his business of real estate while being president, he also spends some of the money campaigning.

then why would u previously suggest that it had something to do with how "democracy" america is ruled by lobbyists, and each senator/ congressman/ president needs to favour the lobbyists to attract funds and not get attacked by the media.

Now youre saying he doesnt need those funds hence he is campaigning and because his son is or whoever is controlling his business and not him.
What is it? U probably have no idea how to make your point.

Trump invested $66 million in 2016 in his campaign https://fortune.com/2016/12/09/donald-trump-campaign-spending/
And i guess i dont need to tell you that he invested less in 2020.

>Now youre saying he doesnt need those funds hence he is campaigning.
When did i ever say that?
>then why would u previously suggest that it had something to do with how "democracy" america is ruled by lobbyists, and each senator/ congressman/ president needs to favour the lobbyists to attract funds and not get attacked by the media.
This is true, dont know what you are trying to point out.
>Trump invested $66 million in 2016 in his campaign https://fortune.com/2016/12/09/donald-trump-campaign-spending/
"He also spends ***some of his money campaigning****"

Now exactly tell me how his presidency influenced his nett worth to lose from over $4 billion to less than $2.5 billion in just 4 years.

He didnt run his business, it was left to his son, who is less experienced in running a billion dollar company then his father, his father couldnt run the business since he got elected as president, he cant run his company and be president.

So it had nothing to do with factors such as financial trust, financial markets, financial bubbles etc etc.
But majority if not everything had to do because his son is inexperienced and did a terrible job, while Trump could have retained the $2 billion nett loss.
(as if Trump always manages every asset/ business he owns)

Seems to me that you have no idea how economics work and that your arguments just fail.

If you said something which had some economic argument, such as his value drops because people after his presidency do not like him and dont want to be associated with him. Then i would have understood it.
https://prnt.sc/wqwzk2
His assets after all, are his brands name. By having one of the most negative presidency ever, it is obvious his brand would lose value.

Escrito por Dave, 15.01.2021 at 12:35

Escrito por DeepFriedUnicorn, 15.01.2021 at 12:28

Even in real life lottos they have a 2nd and 3rd and even 4th 5th 5th 7th and so one. (Depending if it a holiday or something)

Would be nice to have a 2nd and 3rd place

Must be a European thing... I have no idea how that even would work. This is an American lottery, either you win or you don't.

Edit: actually this is better than an American lottery since its guaranteed to pick a winner (or in this case, 2 winners). Normal lotteries can often go without any winner.

I guess it is. Better off doing it like that then. Because I would be more Inclined to buy one. Because I have more of a chance.

And even different type of weekly SP random dip. Idk, something for the community, you get a small amount of SP or something specific for map makers too

Escrito por sirivann, 15.01.2021 at 09:53

Wow a england where its ports arent ports at all xaxaxaxa

Yea how historically inaccurate. Just like how the German Reich invaded and took over England in 1942 while deep within Barbarossa and the United States has to recapture a British city within 3 weeks or all of India and the Middle East will quit the war.